A case study redesigning website for PRIDEnet - the volunteer and community engagement sector of the PRIDE study.


A global healthcare company that develops and markets a wide range of pharmaceutical products across various therapeutic areas. With a primary focus on Neuroscience, Nephrology and Digital Innovation Products, the company places a strong emphasis on research and development to create innovative and impactful healthcare solutions.
PRODUCT DESIGNER
5 months
A case study redesigning website for PRIDEnet - the volunteer and community engagement sector of the PRIDE study.
Otsuka was setting up a new division called the Data Tech and Analytics team which would handle the complete development of dashboards pertaining to patient profiles and clinical trial operations.
As the lead designer, I was tasked with streamlining the entire structure of operations for the new division of Data and Analytics at Otsuka. From optimizing the access of dashboards for users to removing redundant dashboards and helping users access the right one, we had to figure out how to do it all seamlessly. The main objective is to save time and help users view the right reports preventing errors in drawing insights.
Data Tech and Analytic Solution (DTAS) Team
Global Intelligence Team(GCI)
Product Manager
Developers (15)
Scrum Master
Business Analyst
Data Scientist
An optimization system for the Data and Analytics Team at Otsuka to track their development Operations activities
The client is a global pharmaceutical company that is committed to developing new treatments in neuroscience like schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder, and other neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions, including Alzheimer disease, epilepsy, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, and autism.
Develop a robust data optimization framework for the Data and Analytics Team at Otsuka to standardize their Dashboards and make them more accessible.
Project Manager , Developers (15) Scrum Master, Business Analyst, Data Scientist, Data Tech and Analytic Solution (DTAS) Team,
Global Intelligence Team(GCI)
100+ Clinical trial operations reports are being developed every quarter but there is no way for the business to track activities efficiently.
Each Dashboard has multiple iterations in different stages developed by different developers.
Users find it difficult to access the right Dashboard when needed.
A case study redesigning website for PRIDEnet - the volunteer and community engagement sector of the PRIDE study.

With the quantity of data we were dealing with, it was important to get a perspective from the executive team as well as the global Intelligence team that was reponsible for execution. We had to understand individual pain points and how people navigated with the system to find what they wanted.
We spent over two weeks with the team to understand the functionality and what the team hoped to achieve. The major aspects of what I learnt were:
• The volume of dashboards being built on a monthly basis
• Following an agile method, each dashboard had multiple version at different stages of development
• Multiple developers worked on each dashboard, leaving behind multiple versions of each
• Most of the reporting tools were all built by outsourced contractors, so there was no proper handoff and takeover from anyone within Otsuka
• There were no long standing developers, so there was no accountability for maintenance after development



Otsuka was establishing the Data Tech team that would take over these tasks. To be able to design system that laid the foundation at the start, I had to understand the complex workflows of the multiple user types and their interactions with one another needed. In order to achieve that, I gathered as much as I could from the end users to understand the challenges they faced and how we could make a difference in optimizing pain areas.


After conducting countless user interviews, contextual inquiry and analyzing the gathered data, I was able to clear mark out the tasks that were required to be done.


I learnt that the team used MS Azure DevOps to keep track of all their developmental activities. Most users were using it to check the status of development, who was responsible for what and to find the dates for the latest version of Dashboards. After much thought and discussion with the team, we decided to create a connection between the two.
#1:
Standardizing existing dashboards without changing the essence to avoid hinderance in the interim transition.
#2:
Reimagining & Developing Individual Dashboards based on requirements- Operations, Recruitment, Clinical Trials etc
#3:
Tracking portal to monitor the live status of all the Dashboards enabling easy navigation, tracking issues, identifying responsible teams etc.
Countless workshops with the team helped us decipher all the touchpoint they needed to be connected in this system.
We wanted to do away with the multiple manual tasks and proposed a solution to automate the entire process.

After gathering the requirements of the content needed, I developed lo-fidelity mockups to help users understand what we were designing for them. This really helped them visualize better and they were able to give me more feedback about what else they needed or would like to have.

Landing page - Overview


Detailed page - Overview

After developing and testing the lo-fidelity prototypes with the team, I fleshed out the entire high fidelity prototype, including all the feedback and minute details and worked with developers to execute the development. We essentially connected this reporting tool with MS Azure DevOps to help track the live status of all the ongoing and past development activities.
We included links to individual dashboards so the user wouldn't have to search for the right one. We also ensured links to an issue log that would give a detailed prognosis of everything that was happening with details of the troubleshooting team.

We did a usability testing with a focused group of users navigating the system trying to find the right dashboard. The key factors we wanted to address were - access to the latest dashboard, the updating of issues in delay, being able to see the team responsible for the development, and an overview of the timelines of development .
Here are the results we got:
8%
time saved to find the latest Dashboard
25%
time saved to access the information related to operations, issues and development
100%
Accuracy in accessing the correct dashboard
